THE EXORCISM OF EMILY ROSE
Scott Derrickson (2005)
3.5 STARS
From the genesis of religion, there have been exorcisms and since William Friedkin’s pivotal The Exorcist, we have been treated to an almost constant slue of films on the subject. The Exorcism of Emily Rose, subverts the sub-genre from the opening scene and provides something that feels fresh, but does this result in a quality piece of cinema?
In terms of filmmaking, there is not a bad word to be said about Scott Derrickson’s submission, the pacing is spot on, the cinematography is haunting, and a collection of grade-A performances, particularly Jennifer Carpenter as the titular exorcee, combine to create a superb cinematic experience. Vital to this success, are the themes of faith and morality posed in the courtroom where this film spends half of its time.
This is where, depending on your viewpoint, the film either transcends to a new level, or fails to meet expectations. Because, at its core, this is not an exorcism film, but instead a courtroom drama, the stakes never come close to that of its peers. We know, from the off, the result of the exorcism, and while we do get to see the majority of the deed itself, as well as some truly terrifying shots harking back to The Exorcist, this film never really feels scary, it never feels like a horror film.
Going in, I was looking forward to hiding behind my cushion and a sleepless night, but I was disenchanted as the film progressed. It isn’t the experience I was hoping for, then again, we’ve seen that film, and it’s called The Exorcist. The Exorcism of Emily Rose is a quality film that is truly enjoyable, but perhaps it would be more appropriately titled The Trial of Father Moore.